|
The
Talladega
Nights Product
Placement Juggernaut Continues
Exposure Value Likely to Top
$60 Million for Wonder Bread
With the summer comedy hit Talladega Nights: The
Ballad of Ricky Bobby nearing the end of its theatric run, and the
movie's replica racing suits quickly becoming the hot item for Halloween
this year, the unprecedented marketing boost Wonder Bread has received
from its association with the film does not appear to be ending anytime
soon.
Tabbed by the Talladega Nights producers as the
iconic American brand to serve as Ricky Bobby’s (a.k.a. Will Farrell)
racing sponsor for the film, Wonder Bread enjoyed the product placement
ride-along without any appearance fees. That
arrangement proved to be quite a coup for Wonder Bread, paying off even
prior to the movie’s premier, as Farrell took product placement to a new
saturation level when he made national TV appearances, such as on The
Tonight Show, clad in an authentic Wonder Bread racing suit.
The buzz generated from the media blitz enabled Talladega Nights to
claim the top spot at the box office on its opening weekend in early
August, with Wonder Bread shining brilliantly in a co-staring role.
According to Joyce Julius & Associates research, Wonder Bread had
realized nearly $16 million in exposure value (as of October 1), stemming
from print articles, television news features and the product placements
within the film. When also
factoring in exposure value from advertising promoting the movie and
Talladega Nights-related merchandise (die casts, hats, jackets…
basically all the offerings of a real NASCAR team), the profile of the
Wonder Bread brand has certainly been elevated to new heights.
Also adding to this product placement fairy tale is
the fact that Wonder’s parent company, Interstate Bakeries Corp., has
been in Chapter 11 protection since 2004.
Yes, even the back-story here seems to have a Hollywood feel about it.
The Talladega Nights DVD is slated for release
on December 12, just in time for the holidays and a whole new wave of
Wonder Bread exposure. Typically,
the theatric run accounts for about 25% of a film’s total revenue, with
DVD sales and rentals, along with pay-per-view, premium cable and eventual
mainstream television broadcasts dwarfing (from a business perspective) what
happens on the big screen. Ricky
Bobby’s audience is about to increase tenfold, and Wonder Bread's
exposure could soon climb beyond $60 million before the sequel is even
written.
The following table details the locations Wonder
Bread was monitored during Talladega Nights, and the ensuing value
accumulated through October 1, 2006.
| Wonder
Bread's Talladega Nights Product Placements |
| |
|
|
| Logo
Location |
On-Screen
Time |
Exposure
Value |
| |
|
|
|
Bobby's
Uniform
|
3:00
|
$3,570,000
|
|
Crew
Member Uniforms
|
1:47
|
2,122,165
|
|
Bobby's
Helmet
|
1:29
|
1,765,165
|
|
Hood
Identity
|
1:05
|
1,289,165
|
|
Bobby's
Hat
|
1:05
|
1,289,165
|
|
Bread
Loaf
|
0:36
|
714,000
|
|
Shirts
|
0:36
|
714,000
|
|
Rear
Quarter Panel Identity
|
0:24
|
476,000
|
|
Sign
in a Bar
|
0:22
|
436,335
|
|
Bobby's
Jacket
|
0:21
|
416,500
|
|
Mentions
(2)
|
N/A
|
396,665
|
|
TV
Panel Identity
|
0:17
|
337,170
|
|
Cast
on Bobby’s Arm
|
0:15
|
297,500
|
|
Transporter
|
0:15
|
297,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wonder
Bread Total: (2 Ment.)
|
11:32
|
$14,121,330
|
Chase
for the Nextel Cup: Team Sponsor Results From the First Two Race
Telecasts
| Loudon
(Sept. 17) |
|
|
| Sponsor |
Exposure
Value
|
Driver |
Race
Finishing Position |
Points
Standing |
| 1) Reese’s |
$4.3 |
Harvick,
K. |
1 |
3 |
| 2) Budweiser |
3.5 |
Earnhardt
Jr., D. |
13 |
6 |
| 3) DuPont |
3.1 |
Gordon,
J. |
3 |
9 |
| 4) Cingular Wr. |
2.8 |
Burton,
J. |
7 |
8 |
| 5) GMAC |
2.1 |
Vickers,
B. |
5 |
20 |
| 6) Home Depot |
1.8 |
Stewart,
T. |
2 |
11 |
| 7) Miller Lite |
1.6 |
Busch,
Ku. |
19 |
14 |
| 8)
NAPA At. Pt. |
1.5 |
Waltrip,
M. |
23 |
36 |
| 9) Mobil 1 |
1.3 |
Newman,
R. |
12 |
17 |
| 10) DeWalt Tls. |
1.2 |
Kenseth,
M. |
10 |
1 |
| *Exposure
value reflected in millions |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dover
(Sept. 24) |
|
|
| Sponsor |
Exposure
Value
|
Driver |
Race
Finishing Position |
Points
Standing |
| 1)
Budweiser |
$4.1 |
Earnhardt
Jr., D. |
21 |
7 |
| 2) Cingular Wr. |
3.9 |
Burton,
J. |
1 |
5 |
| 3) DeWalt Tls. |
3.3 |
Kenseth,
M. |
10 |
3 |
| 4) Miller Lite |
2.8 |
Busch,
Ku. |
4 |
14 |
| 5) Target |
1.8 |
Sorenson,
R. |
11 |
22 |
| 6)
NAPA At. Pt. |
1.6 |
Waltrip,
M. |
28 |
36 |
| 7) DLP |
1.5 |
Raines,
T. |
23 |
37 |
| 8) Alltel |
1.5 |
Newman,
R. |
24 |
16 |
| 9) AAA |
1.5 |
Martin,
M. |
14 |
6 |
| 10) DuPont |
1.1 |
Gordon,
J. |
3 |
4 |
| *Exposure
value reflected in millions |
Image
Identification Technology Provides Detailed Exposure Results for 2006 US
Open Broadcasts
There should be no wondering why corporate sponsors
were excited about partnering with the 2006 US Open. Occupying center stage in New York – the media capital of the
world – for two weeks each year, the US Open tennis tournament is the
highest attended annual sporting event in the United States and this year,
CBS, USA and CNBC combined to broadcast over 160 hours of tennis coverage.
Once again, Joyce Julius & Associates monitored
every hour of US Open television coverage through the utilization of its
proprietary computerized sponsor tracking system, Image Identification
Technology (IIT). The results
provided data including
in-broadcast exposure results, as well as a variety of additional
information for each US Open sponsor, with a speed and accuracy only IIT
could provide.
Joyce Julius researchers locate specific examples of
logos they want to search for within a broadcast and virtually tell the
IIT system what to look for by identifying, framing, and testing those
examples. IIT then breaks
down the example logo into millions of pixels, and scans the provided
footage for matching pixel groups. The
footage is fragmented into second-long frames, each of which is
individually scanned for every sponsor selected.
When IIT recognizes a sponsor on a particular frame, it
records, among other information, a second of exposure, its size
(percentage of the screen), screen position or location, and overall
quality, which is a percentage comparison of the identified sponsor
against the example provided by the researcher.
IIT allows Joyce Julius researchers to provide its clients with
advanced information about their sponsorship in a shorter period of time.
IIT data from the US Open was used for several
comprehensive comparison studies investigating the quality percentages and
position data collected. For
every frame IIT detects a match, the system tabulates results for that
specific single match. Averaging
or grouping selected data can explain or justify why one sponsor may have
outperformed another. The
first study compared IBM (serve mph) and Citizen Bank (match time), two
companies that sponsor items on the back wall of all US Open courts.
Again, quality is measured by a comparison between the
researcher’s inputted examples and the selected match.
IBM’s logo outperformed Citizen’s in this particular category,
recording 32% of its matches between 90-95% quality and 61% of its matches
above 95%. Citizen recorded 41% of its matches in the 90-95% range, but
only 24% were above 95%. A
simple explanation for IBM’s success in this comparison is its logo
displayed wider, bolder letters, which were more easily seen from the
typical whole court, wide angled shot displayed by network cameras.
A second study examined the on-screen positions of
two side court sponsors,
American Express and Lexus. Both
sponsors benefited from several logo locations placed through the various
courts comprising the USTA Billie
Jean King National Tennis Center. Lexus outperformed American Express for the coveted center
screen position, with 44% of its exposure time occurring in this area,
compared to 27% for American Express.
The following diagrams show the on-screen position percentages for
each sponsor.
American
Express:
Lexus:
The data provided by IIT also allows the Joyce Julius
research staff to disseminate massive amounts of strategic data, which
previously would have taken months to compile. For example, by using the
exposure totals for the back wall sponsors, researchers concluded that
just over 53 hours of tennis was broadcast using the (main) whole court,
wide angled camera. When
excluding commercial time, this 53:06:30 of coverage accounted for almost
42% of the entire coverage time afforded by the broadcasting networks.
Motorsports
Sponsorship
Valvoline's
decision to sign on with Don Schumacher Racing just in time for the NHRA
U.S. Nationals in Indianapolis last month paid off handsomely for the motor oil brand. The
multiple-car operation was largely responsible for supplying Valvoline
(along with subsidiaries Zerex and Pyroil) with 21:01 of
exposure time and 21 verbal references, good for $456,380 of
comparable exposure value. In comparison, Valvoline earned just $132,230
during the 2005 broadcast of the U.S. Nationals.
The
Sauter brothers – Jay, Johnny and Tim – raced against each other in 24
of the first 29 NASCAR Busch Series races this season.
Despite Johnny’s higher ranking in the standings (10th),
Jay’s sponsor, Western Union, holds the edge among the
brothers’ three primary supporters – Lester Building Systems
(Tim), Yellow (Johnny) – in the amount of exposure received
during telecasts devoted to those races.
All told, Western Union has appeared on camera for more than 42
minutes and has received 10 mentions for a comparable value total of
nearly $2.3 million during races in which all three Sauters participated.
In the race for television exposure among auto manufacturers in the 2006 Speed
World Challenge Touring Car Championship, Mazda sits atop the
standings with 2:58:06 of on-screen time, 316 mentions and $628,130 of
comparable value. Mazda
– which leads Acura by more than
$200,000 heading into the Road Atlanta event – also ranks
second overall in terms of exposure value among the 328 sponsors monitored thus
far this broadcast season.
Question:
Which of its four drivers has generated the most television
exposure value
for team sponsor Mobil 1 during Speed World Challenge GT
Championship series telecasts on Speed Channel? Answer:
Ron Fellows. Thus far
in 2006, the veteran road racer, who has carried Mobil 1’s colors in
several races this year, has racked up $12,035 for the sponsor from
driver-related exposure (i.e., vehicle identity, sponsor mentions), ahead
of Andy Pilgrim ($12,010), Johnny O’Connell ($6,965) and Max Angelelli
($3,540).
Call it the commentator effect... Thus far in the 2006 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series
campaign, Aaron’s has enjoyed more than 560 mentions as the
exclusive sponsor of the Lucky Dog award.
When Michael Waltrip is in the booth, his sponsor-friendly
conversations have proven to be far more favorable for the rental company
than when he is not guest commentating.
The average number of mentions for Aaron’s for a non-Waltrip
telecast is 17, good for $29,750 of exposure value.
Meanwhile, in races where Waltrip is commentating, Aaron’s
collects an average of 47 mentions and a whopping $82,250.
What’s in your wallet — graphics! Capital One rode the power of graphics during
telecasts of the IRL IndyCar Series this past season to rank fourth
overall among all sponsors after collecting more than $14 million of
in-broadcast exposure value.
Leaderboard, Presented By, Side-By-Side and Brought to You By
graphics all led to significant screen time for Capital One.
JeanRichard, the official timepiece and
timekeeper of the 2006 American Le Mans Series, has parlayed that role into being the fourth-most exposed sponsor all year in the series.
Utilizing an effective and highly visible gallery of exposure
sources, such as clock identity (0:54/$35,180), along with a rich
assortment of graphics — such as running order (1:22:16/$3,007,065),
Driver Identification (2:15/$121,940) and Battle for 1st (0:30/$34,650) — have combined to push the sponsor to its elite status among
all sponsors of the endurance road racing series.
Utilizing one of the more unlikely sources
for exposure — a T-shirt worn by a race fan — Gilley’s Bar &
Grill has registered 3:59 of exposure time as well as a comparable
value yield of $3,245 this season in the Hooters ProCup Series. A highlight segment
featuring the race fan wearing a shirt emblazoned with the logo
“Lookin’ for love at Gilley’s” while standing in line at one of
the Hooters ProCup souvenir stands has appeared in every telecast this
year and is completely responsible for the watering hole's unlikely
windfall.
The
tandem of Andy Wallace and Butch Leitzinger finished strong in the final
two rounds of the Grand American Rolex Sports Car Series — coming
in second at the Sonoma 250 and third at the Discount
Tire Sunchaser. As a
result, their team sponsor, The Boss Snowplow, earned $44,475 of
comparable exposure value in the final two rounds, or 19% of the
sponsor’s comparable value for the entire broadcast season.
October may
be Breast Cancer Awareness Month, but Ford used the Champ
Car World Series event at Road America on September 24 to start
their observance a little early this year. Between Katherine Legge's
special "Warriors in Pink" paint scheme ($39,280), pink ribbon
decals on all of the Champ Cars ($7,515) and a vignette focusing on the Susan
G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation ($6,850), the automaker's effort to
raise awareness carried an exposure value of nearly $55,000.
SK Hand Tools, sponsor of the Crew Chief of the Race award in the ARCA
RE/MAX Series, picked up nearly $25,000 of in-broadcast exposure from graphics
devoted to the award during the first 13 televised races this season on
Speed Channel.
All told, SK Hand Tools had received more than 2.5 hours of
exposure through the Chicagoland telecasts, of which 4:20 has come
from Crew Chief of the Race graphics.
A
Second Look is a newsletter published by Joyce Julius and Associates,
Inc., updating recent developments, trends and happenings in the areas of
sports, special events and entertainment marketing.
All information contained in this newsletter is available for
journalistic use, with all rights reserved.
|
|