NASCAR at the Halfway Point

 

Struggling Economy Has Varying Effects on Sponsorship Exposure

The news is both pretty good and not so good in terms of measurable sponsorship exposure at the midway point of the 2009 NASCAR seasons.  Overall, the on-screen time and mentions amassed by sponsors in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series are up in comparison to last season, while overall exposure value rose at a much slower pace as a direct result of lower advertising rates charged by the networks.

Meanwhile, sponsorship exposure in the NASCAR Nationwide Series is down in most categories as expected, while findings from the NASCAR Camping World Truck Series are on par with 2008 figures.

“We are noticing that some sponsors have scaled back or rearranged their sponsorship packages,” said Joyce Julius Television Research Manager, Katacia Tramble.  “In previous years, we may have had one or two cars that made the race unsponsored.  This year, we could have three or four per race.  And although most of those cars are competing in a ‘start and park’ way, the cars at the front have maintained their exposure level and have in fact, received more exposure than last year.”

Overall, the first half of the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series saw brands enjoy some 413 hours of combined on-screen time and 6,700 verbal mentions during event coverage, up significantly from marks of 385 hours and 6,200 verbal mentions tabulated a year ago.

Several factors have contributed to increased exposure levels in the series, with the most notable being tremendous logo visibility of the frontrunners, a rain-caused marathon race in Charlotte and a little network TLC thrown at some of the upstart sponsors. 

Tramble points to the first half success of the new Stewart-Haas team, with sponsors Office Depot, Old Spice, Burger King and U.S. Army in the fold, making a splash in several races.  Likewise, Carl Edwards and Aflac, with “one of the most visible hood logos on the track with its black and white scheme” is another major contributor to the overall statistical improvement.

“Ask.com also came onboard this year and they had a great run on Fox with their trivia questions and sponsorship of Bobby Labonte’s car,” Tramble said.  “As a completely new sponsor this year they alone are responsible for one hour, 47 minutes, 42 seconds (1:47:42) of exposure time and 304 mentions.  That is a great return for a new sponsor in the series.”

Reutimann's  Uniform

Coca-Cola 600

 

 

 

Aaron's

0:23:35

Best Western

0:10:25

Dell

0:08:55

Freightliner

0:07:48

General Electric

0:08:29

Goodyear

0:10:05

Hewlett Packard

0:09:05

JVC

0:08:48

LG

0:10:03

Lowes Foods

0:08:51

Maytag

0:09:05

M. Waltrip Rac.

0:03:50

Mitsubishi Electric

0:08:29

NAPA Auto Parts

0:09:27

NASCAR Sprint Cup

0:08:26

Oakley

0:07:05

Philips

0:09:17

Safety-Kleen

0:05:39

SFI

0:00:05

Sharp

0:09:53

Sherwin Williams

0:09:09

shopaarons.com

0:04:48

Sparco

0:01:47

Sunoco

0:05:35

Toyota

0:22:10

XBox 360

0:09:34

Rain-delays, while no fun for drivers or fans alike, are not necessarily frowned upon by sponsors.  It is a simple fact, longer telecasts (albeit not all viewed equally) do provide a tremendous forum for sponsors to grab TV time not normally available during typical coverage.

For example, during the Fox Coca-Cola 600 rain delay coverage this past Memorial Day weekend, the 26 brands monitored on David Reutimann’s driver suit appeared for a combined 3:50:23.  Similarly, 18 sponsors on Michael Waltrip’s uniform collected 44:30.

One ironic twist in the first half of the Sprint Cup season was the reoccurring storyline of the lack of team sponsorship, which in many cases led to unexpected television exposure for some.

“Since there are more cars running without sponsors, the cars who are usually unsponsored are receiving extra attention from the announcers when sponsorship is acquired,” Tramble said.  “In fact, the announcers actually made note to the fact that all cars were sponsored for the Coke 600.  They even zeroed the cameras in on the #36 of Scott Riggs to talk about his sponsors for that race, Shea Trucking and Cooter’s Backyard Bar and Grill.”

The situation has not been as favorable in the Nationwide Series thus far in 2009.  Team sponsor television exposure is down from a year ago.  Symptomatic of a lack of committed sponsorship, total brands appearing on Nationwide Series hoods is down 25%, while overall on-screen time from this potent exposure source has fallen 8%.  Couple the lowered team sponsor results with a decreased activation by the auto manufacturers—both Chevrolet and Dodge exposure figures are down—and the cumulative negative effect is significant.

As racing’s renegotiating season gets underway, no doubt the up and down results of the first half, brought on by the worst US economy in generations, will continue to have a major effect on sponsorship of the sport.

“Looking at 2010, it will be interesting to see how many sponsor changes occur.  DeWalt has already announced that they will not be returning to Kenseth’s car next year, thus ending a successful 10-year run with Roush.  The top sponsor charts may look very different next year.”


Lesnar's Strange UFC Brew

Brock Lesnar’s rant and subsequent apology for his disparaging comments regarding UFC corporate sponsor Bud Light earlier this month at UFC 100 led to his beverage of choice, Coors Light, picking up $250,000 of unexpected media exposure value.

Lesnar, in a post fight rage, told the sellout crowd at Mandalay Bay Events Center “I’m going home tonight and drink a Coors Light.  That’s a Coors Light because Bud Light won’t pay me nothing.”  Lesnar later rescinded his comments at the insistence of UFC President Dana White, but the media buzz was already in full swing.

In addition to Lesnar’s two mentions of Coors Light during the live Pay-Per-View broadcast, highlights of the meltdown were covered on SportsCenter and various ESPN programming the remainder of the weekend. 

Print and Internet media also chronicled the beer brand war, as more than 400 news articles referenced Coors Light and Lesnar.   Social media also gravitated to the topic with some 1,300 blogs addressing the topic, highlighted by Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban’s posting, where he wrote:  “Lesnar’s post fight speech probably was the best ever in all of sports.”


A Little Rain Must Fall

Last June’s rain-soaked U.S. Open at Bethpage was a challenge for players, fans and networks alike.  Rounds and days overlapped each other all weekend before Lucas Glover finally wrapped up the championship at 1:21 pm Monday afternoon with a three-foot putt for victory.

One silver lining, from a sponsorship standpoint, of extended rain coverage is the added opportunity for corporate logos to make an appearance on television. Look no farther than the umbrella used by Tiger Woods--fashionably adorned with a brand new AT&T logo--as an example of Mother Nature’s marketing contribution.

During NBC’s marathon coverage on Sunday, the Woods AT&T umbrella was monitored for one minute, 33 seconds.  When compared to the cost of a commercial during the telecast, AT&T garnered an exposure value of $231,725.

Not bad bonus exposure for another rainy day on the course...


NHL Playoff Games Serve as

Testing Ground for Virtual Signs 

In-broadcast virtual signs made their National Hockey League debut this past spring, and while only used on a very limited basis, the results were noteworthy.  With sponsors averaging nearly 20 minutes of quality on-screen time per game from the high-tech broadcast enhancement, no doubt we have not seen the last of the virtual signs. 

Optimally positioned and occupying more screen space than the traditional hockey board sign, these virtual hockey signs (located on the glass areas behind the goals and at center ice) literally dominate the telecast from the home viewer’s perspective.

Joyce Julius & Associates monitored MSG Network’s Game Three telecast of the April NHL Playoff series between the New York Rangers and Washington Capitals, broadcast from New York’s Madison Square Garden.  During that telecast, superimposed Subway logos, located on the glass areas behind each goal and at center ice, appeared clear and in-focus for five minutes, 37 seconds (5:37) during the third period only.  Two nights later during Game Four, the Subway logos again enjoyed virtual placement during the third period, and were monitored for 7:16.

When comparing the in-broadcast exposure to the estimated cost of a commercial during each respective telecast, and applying Joyce Julius Recognition Grading (RG)—which takes into account such factors as size and placement of the image on screen, as well as brand clutter—the Subway virtual signage garnered a two-game, two-period exposure value of $71,500.

Not only do the superimposed logos behind each goal garner a tremendous amount of on-screen time during game action, but the favorable size and screen position of the logos also enhance the Recognition Grade of the television exposure compared to traditional board signs.  While the typical permanent branded sign occupies 0.8% of the screen, the larger virtual signs, located on the glass above the board signs, generally filled 2.2% of the screen.

MSG Network first tested the virtual ads at the end of the regular season with the Subway logo, and then added logos for New York Life and Cablevision for the playoff games.  The virtual signage technology was supplied by Princeton Video Image, which also has provided real-time video insertion to Major League Baseball and the National Football League.

Subway:   MSG Network    April 20, 2009   (3rd Period)

Location                  Exposure Time             RG Value

Behind Goals (Glass)                4:56                $27,380                          

Center Ice (Glass)                     0:41                    3,790

Period Total:                             5:37                $31,170   

                       

Subway:   MSG Network    April 22, 2009   (3rd Period)

Location                     Exposure Time           RG Value

Behind Goals (Glass)                4:25                $24,510                          

Center Ice (Glass)                     2:51                  15,815 

Period Total:                             7:16                $40,325


Motorsports Sponsorship

John Force still rules NHRA, at least during this year’s Full Throttle event broadcasts on ESPN/ESPN2.  Through the first dozen events of 2009, Force leads all competitors in generating a combined $10.9 million of exposure value for the 69 brands monitored in association with him so far this season.  And the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, as daughter Ashley Force Hood was ranked second with an overall intake of $8.2 million for her sponsors.

It couldn’t have come at a better time... CITI, the primary sponsor on Ricky Stenhouse Jr.’s NASCAR Nationwide Series entry, has collected more on-screen time than any other team sponsor through the first 16 event telecasts of 2009.  All told, the Roush Fenway Racing corporate partner collected a Series high 4:16:06 of on-camera time.  The exposure time, coupled with a dozen verbal mentions of the financial institution, calculates to an exposure value of nearly $12.6 million.

During Versus' Indy 500 qualifying coverage and ABC’s telecast of the Indianapolis 500, the sponsoring brands associated with winner Helio Castroneves combined for nearly $14.9 million of exposure value.  Altogether, the 20 Castroneves-sponsoring brands and the Team Penske name appeared on-screen for a combined 2:01:56, and were mentioned a total of 16 times in association with the Indy champion.

Traxxas, a maker of radio-controlled hobby vehicles, is enjoying significant national television exposure this year thanks to its title sponsorship of The Off Road Championship (TORC).  During ABC’s one-hour telecast of the Perris, CA, event in June, Traxxas amassed nearly $900,000 of comparable exposure value from 28:13 of in-broadcast exposure time and nine verbal references.

A staple of every post-race American Le Mans Series telecast, the Michelin Man has appeared for 3:14 during the first four telecasts of 2009, good for some $160,000 of exposure value.  The Michelin Man has been the fourth most-viewed source of exposure during the race telecasts for the tire manufacturer thus far, trailing only running order graphics, driver hats and vehicle identity in view of on-board cameras.

Question:  Whose hood sponsor has been seen the most during the first 11 NASCAR Camping World Truck Series event telecasts?  Answer:  The Kyle Busch/Brian Ickler hood containing a Miccosukee Resort logo has been monitored for 49:11 ($800,015).  The Con-way Freight logo on Colin Braun’s hood was second with 41:56 ($617,645).

Unique sponsorship tie-in alert:  The ARCA RE/MAX race at Michigan this past June was title sponsored by Racing for Wildlife – a joint venture between the Ryan Newman Foundation and The Conservation Fund – for the purposes of raising funds to save a historic youth camp in Michigan.  Throughout Speed Channel’s live and replayed coverage of the event, Racing for Wildlife received 16:50 of on-screen time and 40 mentions, leading to a comparable value total of $223,150 and a much increased awareness of the program.

The top five auto manufacturers, in terms of in-broadcast exposure value, through the first five events of the 2009 Grand Am Rolex Sports Car Series were Porsche ($1 million), Pontiac ($575,000), Mazda ($574,000), Ford ($560,000) and Lexus ($500,000).


Bowl Game In-Broadcast Analyses Features 

Online Access to Joyce Julius Findings

Access all in-broadcast exposure findings for the 2009-10 college bowl game season with a single online Joyce Julius subscription.  Along with digital access to each issue of our traditional, four-page Sponsors Report, subscribers have 24/7 access to the industry’s most detailed and customizable television exposure findings.  Whether looking for a quick game exposure total, a deep-dive source analysis, or a complete brand detailing across multiple games, Joyce Julius’ user-friendly system is the best source of exposure findings available.

See every source of exposure

View top-line or detailed results

Adjust the ad rate calculations

Save findings to your desktop

Archived Sponsors Report issues

No additional software required

To learn more about our College Bowl Game Packages, please contact our Joyce Julius Sales Representatives:

Laura Webb

VP Sales

734.971.1900 x.22

LWebb@joycejulius.com

 

 

 

Cathie Joynt

Account Executive

734.971.1900 x.19

Cathie@joycejulius.com

 

 

 

 

 


 

A Second Look is a newsletter published by Joyce Julius & Associates, Inc., updating recent developments, trends and happenings in the areas of sports, special events and entertainment marketing.  All information contained in this newsletter is available for journalistic use, with all rights reserved. Copyright ©2009 Joyce Julius & Associates, Inc.

www.joycejulius.com                                                                                  Ph:  734.971.1900